Horse Race, 2026 midtermsHorse Race, 2026 midterms

Who's ahead, who's paying, what could flip

Senate · midterms 2014–2026

The Payout

Does more money buy more votes? Across 91 Senate races in the last three midterms, going from even money to twice the other side's came with about +3.5 points over the state's partisan lean (likely +1.5 to +6.0). Past that, there are too few lopsided races to tell whether more money helps at all. 2026 is plotted from polls and isn't final.

Updated

Click any mark to see exactly where its number comes from. ★ = incumbent.

Even → 2× the money

+3.5 pts

likely +1.5 to +6.0

over the state's presidential lean (fitted trend)

2× → 4×

+0.6 pts

likely −0.8 to +1.9 · can't rule out zero

over the state's presidential lean (fitted trend)

4× → 8×

−0.9 pts

likely −2.5 to +0.4 · can't rule out zero

over the state's presidential lean (fitted trend)

All completed midterms (fitted trend)

Likely range of that trend (90%)

2014

2018

2022

2026 — polls, provisional

▸ beyond 64× (on the edge)

Campaign money or outside money?

Most Senate money now comes from outside groups. Does it pay off like a campaign's own spending? Each dot is a completed race; across, the non-Republican's share of that kind of money (outside money only where at least $1M was spent).

2014

2018

2022

Fitted trend

Likely range (90%)

Campaign money

91 races · on its own, a 2-to-1 edge came with +2.9 pts (likely +0.5 to +6.0)

Outside money

56 races · on its own, a 2-to-1 edge came with +0.0 pts (likely −3.7 to +3.5)

A 2-to-1 campaign-money edge

+2.3 pts

likely +0.8 to +3.5

holding outside money and the year fixed

A 2-to-1 outside-money edge

+1.2 pts

likely −0.3 to +2.9 · can't rule out zero

holding campaign money and the year fixed

In the 56 races with real outside spending, a campaign's own money tracks its result; outside money's effect can't be told apart from zero. Outside money pours into the closest races, which may hide what it buys, so treat this as a pattern, not proof.

2026: who's running ahead of their money

What each race's spending advantage predicted from past midterms, at this year's national mood, against today's polling average. Races usually land within about 9.2 points of the prediction; gaps bigger than that are marked ●. Polls can be off too, and a single race can beat the odds for reasons money doesn't capture: a scandal, a strong local brand, an unusual opponent.

RaceMoneyMoney predictsPollsRunning ahead of the money

Arkansas 2026

Cotton 5.7× moreCotton +30.4Cotton +9.7Hallie Shoffner by 20.7 pts ●

Maine 2026

Jackson evenJackson +17.0Jackson +2.4Susan Collins by 14.6 pts ●

Tennessee 2026

Hagerty over 64× moreHagerty +32.8Hagerty +20.0Marquita Bradshaw by 12.8 pts ●

Massachusetts 2026

Markey 1.5× moreMarkey +37.4Markey +24.7John Deaton by 12.7 pts ●

Alabama 2026

Moore over 64× moreMoore +33.2Moore +21.0Everett Wess by 12.2 pts ●

Illinois 2026

Stratton 1.1× moreStratton +21.5Stratton +13.0Don Tracy by 8.5 pts

Minnesota 2026

Tafoya 1.3× moreFlanagan +12.5Flanagan +4.0Michele Tafoya by 8.4 pts

Nebraska 2026

Ricketts 1.1× moreRicketts +10.7Ricketts +2.3Dan Osborn by 8.4 pts

Texas 2026

Paxton 1.3× morePaxton +5.4Talarico +1.4James Talarico by 6.8 pts

New Hampshire 2026

Pappas 1.1× morePappas +13.6Pappas +7.2John Sununu by 6.4 pts

Polling data: VoteHub, licensed CC BY 4.0. Campaign finance: Federal Election Commission.